General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200 (1935)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200 (1935)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 296 U.S. 188, click here.
General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering No. 41 Argued November 15, 1935 Decided December 9, 1935 296 U.S. 200
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. When a corporation, owning shares in another company which have increased in value since it bought them, declares a dividend payable in such shares out of the surplus arising from such increase, and pays it accordingly by distributing such shares in specie among its stockholders, no taxable gain results to the corporation. This is not a sale to stockholders, nor a use of assets to discharge indebtedness. Pp. 202, 206.
2. In reviewing a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, the Circuit Court of Appeals may not sustain an assessment over the Board’s decision upon a ground which was not presented to the Board nor in the petition for review; the taxpayer is entitled to know with fair certainty the basis of the claim against him. P. 206.
3. The Circuit Court of Appeals committed error in this case not only in deciding a question not properly raised, but also in making an inference of fact in conflict with the stipulation of the parties and the findings of the Board of Tax Appeals and without support in the record. P. 206.
4. Upon reversal of judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals overruling a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, the cause will not be remanded to the Board for further findings if it be apparent that nothing could properly be found to sustain the Commissioner’s contention. P. 207.
74 F.2d 972 reversed.
Certiorari, 295 U.S. 730, to review a judgment which reversed a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals overruling an income tax assessment.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200 (1935) in 296 U.S. 200 296 U.S. 201. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PTXR12MRU5KXVQN.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200 (1935), in 296 U.S. 200, page 296 U.S. 201. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PTXR12MRU5KXVQN.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200 (1935). cited in 1935, 296 U.S. 200, pp.296 U.S. 201. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PTXR12MRU5KXVQN.
|