|
|
South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989)
South Carolina v. Gathers No. 88-305 Argued March 28, 1989 Decided June 12, 1989 490 U.S. 805
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Syllabus
Respondent was convicted of murder and sentenced to death in a South Carolina court. The prosecutor’s closing argument at the sentencing phase included his reading to the jury at length from a religious tract the victim was carrying and comments on the personal qualities that the prosecutor inferred from the victim’s possession of the religious tract and a voter registration card. Finding that the prosecutor’s
extensive comments to the jury regarding the victim’s character were unnecessary to an understanding of the circumstances of the crime,
the South Carolina Supreme Court concluded that those comments "conveyed the suggestion [respondent] deserved a death sentence because the victim was a religious man and a registered voter," and, in reliance on Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496, reversed respondent’s death sentence and remanded for a new sentencing proceeding.
Held: "For purposes of imposing the death penalty . . . [the defendant’s] punishment must be tailored to his personal responsibility and moral guilt." Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782, 801. Here, the prosecutor’s comments concerned the victim’s personal characteristics, and
[a]llowing the jury to rely on [this information] . . . could result in imposing the death sentence because of factors about which the defendant was unaware, and that were irrelevant to the decision to kill.
Booth v. Maryland, supra, at 505. The content of the religious tract and the voter registration card could not possibly have been relevant to the "circumstances of the crime." Where there was no evidence that respondent read either the tract or the voter card, the content of the papers the victim was carrying was purely fortuitous, and could not provide any information relevant to respondent’s moral culpability, notwithstanding that the papers had been admitted in evidence for other purposes. Pp. 810-812.
295 S.C. 476, 369 S.E.2d 140, affirmed.
BRENNAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which WHITE, MARSHALL, BLACKMUN, and STEVENS, JJ., joined. WHITE, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 812. O’CONNOR, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which REHNQUIST, C.J., and KENNEDY, J., joined, post, p. 812. SCALIA, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 823.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989) in 490 U.S. 805 490 U.S. 806. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PPWVKLV8UJIVJVH.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989), in 490 U.S. 805, page 490 U.S. 806. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PPWVKLV8UJIVJVH.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989). cited in 1989, 490 U.S. 805, pp.490 U.S. 806. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PPWVKLV8UJIVJVH.
|