|
|
Hellenbeck v. Leimert, 295 U.S. 116 (1935)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Hellenbeck v. Leimert, 295 U.S. 116 (1935)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 295 U.S. 112, click here.
Hellenbeck v. Leimert No. 600 Argued April 5, 1935 Decided April 29, 1935 295 U.S. 116
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. Overdraft checks, drawn on a bank affiliated with a clearinghouse, were presented to the drawee, through a clearinghouse settlement, by a member bank which had received them from an indorser bank for collection. The drawee failed to comply with a clearinghouse rule requiring it to notify the member bank within a specified time in case of nonpayment, but returned the checks later, for reimbursement, to the indorser bank, which was neither a member nor an affiliate of the clearinghouse. Held that the checks were paid, and the indorser not liable. P. 122.
2. An overdraft check deposited by an indorser bank with a collecting bank was credited by the collector to the indorser’s account, charged against the drawee’s account, and sent to the drawee. The drawee accepted the check and gave no notice of its dishonor to the collecting bank, but later returned it to the indorser bank for reimbursement. Held that the check had been paid, and the indorser was not liable. P. 122.
3. Semble that § 102, par. 1 of the Illinois Negotiable Instruments Law refers to the time for giving notice of dishonor, not to the time within which the drawee of a check dishonored may return it after tentative clearinghouse settlement, nor to advice concerning overdrafts. P. 123.
72 F.2d 480 reversed.
Certiorari, 294 U.S. 699, to review the affirmance of a judgment recovered in an action on checks.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Hellenbeck v. Leimert, 295 U.S. 116 (1935) in 295 U.S. 116 295 U.S. 117–295 U.S. 119. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PJTY7Q9C1YTIB65.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Hellenbeck v. Leimert, 295 U.S. 116 (1935), in 295 U.S. 116, pp. 295 U.S. 117–295 U.S. 119. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PJTY7Q9C1YTIB65.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Hellenbeck v. Leimert, 295 U.S. 116 (1935). cited in 1935, 295 U.S. 116, pp.295 U.S. 117–295 U.S. 119. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PJTY7Q9C1YTIB65.
|