King v. Putnam Investment Co., 248 U.S. 23 (1918)

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 248 U.S. 9, click here.

King v. Putnam Investment Company


No. 10


Submitted November 7, 1918
Decided November 18, 1918
248 U.S. 23

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

Syllabus

The contention that a contract of agency to sell real estate was void because federal lands, under homestead entry, were included presents no federal question where the state court found they were not included and the record supports the finding.

Writ of error to review 96 Kan. 109 dismissed.

The case is stated in the opinion.