|
Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. Mitchell, 277 U.S. 213 (1928)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. Mitchell, 277 U.S. 213 (1928)
Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Columbia, South Carolina v. Mitchell No. 456 Argued March 13, 1928 Decided May 14, 1928 277 U.S. 213
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. A suit to collect promissory notes exceeding the jurisdictional amount, brought by a Federal Intermediate Credit Bank chartered under the Act of March 4, 1923, is, because of the plaintiff’s federal incorporation, a suit arising under the laws of the United States and within the jurisdiction of the district court under Jud.Code § 24(1). P. 214.
2. Such jurisdiction is not affected by § 12, Act of February 13, 1925, since ownership by the United States of all of the plaintiff’s capital stock brings the case within the proviso of that section. P. 217.
3. Section 201(c) of the Act of March 4, 1923, supra, in the provision that each such bank "for purposes of jurisdiction shall be deemed a citizen of the state where it is located," governs the places where suit may be brought against such banks, but is in nowise inconsistent with the general rule that district courts have jurisdiction of suits brought by or against corporations organized under an Act of Congress on the ground that they are controversies arising under federal law. Hermann v. Edwards, 238 U.S. 107, distinguished. Pp. 315-317.
4. In the absence of enactments plainly expressing that purpose, Congress will not be held to have intended to restrict that jurisdiction. P. 317.
21 F.2d 51 reversed.
Certiorari, 275 U.S. 516, to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which affirmed a judgment of the district court dismissing an action by the Bank for want of jurisdiction.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. Mitchell, 277 U.S. 213 (1928) in 277 U.S. 213 277 U.S. 214. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=P9IVNHUG9ZAC944.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. Mitchell, 277 U.S. 213 (1928), in 277 U.S. 213, page 277 U.S. 214. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=P9IVNHUG9ZAC944.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. Mitchell, 277 U.S. 213 (1928). cited in 1928, 277 U.S. 213, pp.277 U.S. 214. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=P9IVNHUG9ZAC944.
|