|
|
Helvering v. Reynolds, 313 U.S. 428 (1941)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Helvering v. Reynolds, 313 U.S. 428 (1941)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 313 U.S. 409, click here.
Helvering v. Reynolds No. 684 Argued April 30, May 1, 1941 Decided May 26, 1941 313 U.S. 428
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. Under § 113(a)(5) of the Revenue Act of 1934, which provides that, where property is "acquired by bequest, devise, or inheritance," the basis for computing gain or loss shall be its value "at the time of such acquisition," and under Treasury Regulations 86, construing that provision, the basis in the case of securities that were owned by the testator in specie and that were delivered to the taxpayer in pursuance of a testamentary trust, and sold by him, is their value at the time of the testator’s death, although the taxpayer’s interest at that time, under the will was a contingent remainder. P. 431.
The fact that the Regulation was not promulgated until some time after the transactions occurred which gave rise to the tax is immaterial.
2. The rule that reenactment implies a legislative adoption of administrative or judicial construction of the language reenacted is no more than an aid in statutory construction. It does not mean that the prior construction becomes so imbedded in the law that only Congress can change it; it gives way before changes in the prior rule or practice through exercise by the administrative agency of its continuing rulemaking power. P. 432.
3. Under the Revenue Act of 1934, where securities delivered by a testamentary trustee to a legatee who derived ownership through a bequest of a contingent remainder were securities purchased by the trustee, the basis for computing gain or lo was their cost to the trustee. P. 434.
114 F.2d 804 reversed.
Certiorari, 312 U.S. 672, to review a judgment overruling a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, 41 B.T.A. 59, sustaining a tax assessment.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Helvering v. Reynolds, 313 U.S. 428 (1941) in 313 U.S. 428 313 U.S. 429. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=P61FC6PR8YIF9XX.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Helvering v. Reynolds, 313 U.S. 428 (1941), in 313 U.S. 428, page 313 U.S. 429. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=P61FC6PR8YIF9XX.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Helvering v. Reynolds, 313 U.S. 428 (1941). cited in 1941, 313 U.S. 428, pp.313 U.S. 429. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=P61FC6PR8YIF9XX.
|