Sacramento Navigation Co. v. Salz, 273 U.S. 326 (1927)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Sacramento Navigation Co. v. Salz, 273 U.S. 326 (1927)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 273 U.S. 324, click here.
Sacramento Navigation Company v. Salz No. 51 Argued December 2, 3, 1926 Decided February 21, 1927 273 U.S. 326
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. A contract for the transportation of cargo shipped on board a barge, with privilege to the carrier of reshipping, in whole or in part, on steamboats or barges and of towing with one steamer two or more barges at the same time, is a contract of affreightment, in which it is necessarily implied that the barge as a means of transportation will be used in conjunction with a steamer or tug, to be furnished by the carrier, the two constituting together the effective instrumentality. P. 328.
2. In such case, the barge and the tug together constitute the "vessel transporting merchandise or property" within § 3 of the Harter Act. P. 330.
3. The rule of strict construction is not violated by permitting the words of a statute to have their full meaning or the more extended of two meanings. P. 329.
3 F.2d 759 reversed.
Certiorari (268 U.S. 683) to a decree of the circuit court of appeals which affirmed a decree of the district court in favor of Salz, the present respondent, in a suit in personam brought by him to recover for the loss of a cargo of barley while it was being towed by the petitioner under a contract of affreightment.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Sacramento Navigation Co. v. Salz, 273 U.S. 326 (1927) in 273 U.S. 326 273 U.S. 327. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=P1PLHE21N3UYNK7.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Sacramento Navigation Co. v. Salz, 273 U.S. 326 (1927), in 273 U.S. 326, page 273 U.S. 327. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=P1PLHE21N3UYNK7.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Sacramento Navigation Co. v. Salz, 273 U.S. 326 (1927). cited in 1927, 273 U.S. 326, pp.273 U.S. 327. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=P1PLHE21N3UYNK7.
|