Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co., 240 U.S. 179 (1916)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co., 240 U.S. 179 (1916)
Straus v. Notaseme Company No. 184 Argued January 17-18, 1916 Decided February 21, 1916 240 U.S. 179
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Syllabus
While one using an unregistered design similar to that adopted earlier by another may be enjoined from further use thereof, he may not be charged with profits if it appear that the original imitation was unintentional, that no deceit or substitution of goods was accomplished in fact, and that no considerable part of the business was due to his goods’ being supposed to be those of the earlier user of the design.
One innocently adopting an unregistered design and continuing to use the same after notice, not for the purpose of stealing the goodwill of the earlier user, but of preserving his own business, held, in this case, not to be charged with profits not shown to have been obtained by sales of articles supposed to be those of the earlier user.
Relief for unfair competition not given, as the supposed unfairness consisted mainly in the use of a device that the earlier user sought to have registered, but was refused.
215 F. 361 reversed in part.
The facts, which involve questions of unfair competition by using an unregistered trademark adopted as a business design for hosiery, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co., 240 U.S. 179 (1916) in 240 U.S. 179 Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=NRDWTGAF3UVEPTS.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co., 240 U.S. 179 (1916), in 240 U.S. 179, Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=NRDWTGAF3UVEPTS.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co., 240 U.S. 179 (1916). cited in 1916, 240 U.S. 179. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=NRDWTGAF3UVEPTS.
|