|
R. E. Sheehan Co. v. Shuler, 265 U.S. 371 (1924)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
R. E. Sheehan Co. v. Shuler, 265 U.S. 371 (1924)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 265 U.S. 365, click here.
R. E. Sheehan Co. v. Shuler No. 593 Argued January 9, 1924 Decided May 26, 1924 265 U.S. 371
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Syllabus
Amendments of the New York Workmen’s Compensation Law (see New York Central R. Co. v. White, 243 U.S. 188,) provide that, when an injury causes the death of an employee leaving no beneficiaries, the employer or other insurance carrier shall pay the state Treasurer $500 for each of two special funds, one to be used in paying additional compensation to employees incurring permanent total disability after partial disability, the other in vocational education of employees so injured as to need rehabilitation, the use of the special funds for these purposes being additional compensation to employees thus injured over and above that prescribed as the payments to be made by their immediate employers.
Held:
(1) That the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not require that this additional compensation be paid by the immediate employers of the employees to be benefited, nor prevent the legislature from providing for its payment out of general funds created as above described. P. 376. Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington, 243 U.S. 219.
(2) The arrangement does not conflict with the equal protection clause. P. 378.
236 N.Y. 579 affirmed.
Error to a judgment affirming two awards under the New York Workmen’s Compensation Law entered in the Supreme Court of New York after affirmances by the Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals and remittitur of the record. See also the case next following, post, p. 379.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," R. E. Sheehan Co. v. Shuler, 265 U.S. 371 (1924) in 265 U.S. 371 265 U.S. 372. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=NFEP2EEQP74NRAP.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." R. E. Sheehan Co. v. Shuler, 265 U.S. 371 (1924), in 265 U.S. 371, page 265 U.S. 372. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=NFEP2EEQP74NRAP.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in R. E. Sheehan Co. v. Shuler, 265 U.S. 371 (1924). cited in 1924, 265 U.S. 371, pp.265 U.S. 372. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=NFEP2EEQP74NRAP.
|