|
Young v. Higbee Co., 324 U.S. 204 (1945)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Young v. Higbee Co., 324 U.S. 204 (1945)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 324 U.S. 200, click here.
Young v. Higbee Co. No. 342 Argued February 1, 1945 Decided February 26, 1945 324 U.S. 204
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
From a decree confirming a plan of reorganization under Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act, an appeal was taken by P and B, holders of preferred stock. The appeal was based largely upon objections to allowances made to junior claimants, and, had it been successful, the preferred stockholders as a class would have benefited. For a consideration paid to them, P and B transferred their stock to junior claimants and agreed to abandon the appeal. Petitioner, also a holder of preferred stock, sought to intervene and prosecute the appeal. The Circuit Court of Appeals denied leave and dismissed the appeal. Petitioner thereupon filed in the bankruptcy court a petition, on behalf of himself and all other preferred stockholders, seeking an accounting by P and B to the debtor or to the preferred stockholders, for the excess of the amount which they had received over the fair value of their stock.
Held:
1. The Circuit Court of Appeals’ dismissal of the appeal over petitioner’s attempt to intervene did not bar petitioner’s subsequent petition for an accounting. P. 208.
2. The fruit of the appeal by P and B belongs to all of the preferred stockholders. P. 213.
3. The bankruptcy court has jurisdiction to award the relief prayed. P. 214.
4. The alleged improper motive of the petitioner does not warrant denial of the prayer for relief, which was made on behalf of all the stockholders. P. 214.
142 F.2d 1004, reversed.
Certiorari, 323 U.S. 689, to review a judgment which affirmed the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of an application for relief.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Young v. Higbee Co., 324 U.S. 204 (1945) in 324 U.S. 204 324 U.S. 205. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MPYW1CE1J9JKXF2.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Young v. Higbee Co., 324 U.S. 204 (1945), in 324 U.S. 204, page 324 U.S. 205. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MPYW1CE1J9JKXF2.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Young v. Higbee Co., 324 U.S. 204 (1945). cited in 1945, 324 U.S. 204, pp.324 U.S. 205. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MPYW1CE1J9JKXF2.
|