|
United States v. Norris, 281 U.S. 619 (1930)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Norris, 281 U.S. 619 (1930)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 281 U.S. 610, click here.
United States v. Norris No. 555 Argued April 28, 1930 Decided May 26, 1930 281 U.S. 619
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. After entry of a plea of nolo contendere to an indictment charging conspiracy unlawfully to transport intoxicating liquors in violation of the National Prohibition Act, a stipulation of facts filed by a defendant and received by the trial court merely as evidence for its information in determining what sentence should be imposed is ineffective to import an issue as to the sufficiency of the indictment, or an issue of fact upon the question of guilt or innocence. P. 622.
2. If the stipulation be regarded as adding particulars to the indictment, it is void under the rule that nothing can be added to an indictment without the concurrence of the grand jury by which the bill was found. Id.
3. Regarded as evidence upon the question of guilt or innocence, the stipulation came too late, for the plea of nolo contendere, upon that question and for that case, was as conclusive as a plea of guilty would have been. P. 623.
4. After a plea of nolo contendere, nothing remains for the court but to render judgment, as no issue of fact exists and none can be made while the plea remains of record. Id.
34 F.2d 839, reversed.
Certiorari, post, p. 707, to review a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which reversed a judgment of the district court, 29 F.2d 744, sentencing the respondent after a plea of nolo contendere to an indictment charging conspiracy to transport intoxicating liquors in violation of the National Prohibition Act.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Norris, 281 U.S. 619 (1930) in 281 U.S. 619 281 U.S. 620. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MGJ16KG31LR6MCZ.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Norris, 281 U.S. 619 (1930), in 281 U.S. 619, page 281 U.S. 620. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MGJ16KG31LR6MCZ.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Norris, 281 U.S. 619 (1930). cited in 1930, 281 U.S. 619, pp.281 U.S. 620. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MGJ16KG31LR6MCZ.
|