|
|
Flight Attendants v. Zipes, 491 U.S. 754 (1989)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Flight Attendants v. Zipes, 491 U.S. 754 (1989)
Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Zipes No. 88-608 Argued April 25, 1989 Decided June 22, 1989 491 U.S. 754
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
After protracted litigation, respondents, a class of female flight attendants alleging that Trans World Airlines’ policy of dismissing flight attendants who became mothers constituted sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, entered into a settlement agreement with TWA in which the airline agreed, inter alia, to credit class members with full company and union "competitive" seniority. At this point, petitioner, the collective bargaining agent for TWA flight attendants, intervened in the lawsuit on behalf of incumbent flight attendants who would be adversely affected by the conferral of the seniority, challenging the settlement agreement on the grounds that (1) the court lacked jurisdiction to award equitable relief to one of the subclasses of respondents, and (2) the terms of the settlement would violate the existing collective bargaining agreement. After this challenge was rejected, respondents petitioned the District Court for an award of attorney’s fees against petitioner under § 706(k) of the Act. The court awarded fees against petitioner, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.
Held: District courts may award Title VII attorney’s fees against those who are not charged with Title VII violations but intervene to protect their own rights only where the intervention is frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation. Assessing fees against blameless intervenors is not essential to § 706(k)’s central purpose of providing victims of wrongful discrimination an incentive to file suit. The prospect of uncompensated fees in litigation against such persons exists in any event, since they may choose to attack the decree collaterally instead of intervening -- an undesirable result that the rule respondents urge would foster. While petitioner’s advocacy of its members’ bargained-for rights was not the specific type of conduct § 706(k) was intended to encourage, neither was it conduct that the statute aimed to deter. Pp. 758-766.
846 F.2d 434, reversed and remanded.
SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which REHNQUIST, C.J., and WHITE, O’CONNOR, and KENNEDY, JJ., joined. BLACKMUN, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, post, p. 766. MARSHALL, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BRENNAN, J., joined, post, p. 770. STEVENS, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Flight Attendants v. Zipes, 491 U.S. 754 (1989) in 491 U.S. 754 491 U.S. 755. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MGFII9NWV6SA1VE.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Flight Attendants v. Zipes, 491 U.S. 754 (1989), in 491 U.S. 754, page 491 U.S. 755. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MGFII9NWV6SA1VE.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Flight Attendants v. Zipes, 491 U.S. 754 (1989). cited in 1989, 491 U.S. 754, pp.491 U.S. 755. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MGFII9NWV6SA1VE.
|