|
|
Love v. Flahive, 205 U.S. 195 (1907)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Love v. Flahive, 205 U.S. 195 (1907)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 205 U.S. 187, click here.
Love v. Flahive No. 236 Submitted March 8, 1907 Decided March 25, 1907 205 U.S. 195
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Syllabus
In a contest over a homestead entry, whether there was a sale and whether the thing sold was or was not the tract in question are matters of fact to be determined by the testimony, and the findings of the Land Department in those respects are conclusive in the courts.
While a homesteader cannot make a valid and enforceable contract to sell the land he is seeking to enter, he is not bound to perfect his application, but may abandon or relinquish his rights in the land, and if he in fact makes a sale, he is no longer interested in the land, and the government can treat the sale as a relinquishment, and patent the land to other applicants.
83 P. 882 affirmed.
On December 3, 1900, Edward H. Love commenced this suit in the District Court of Missoula County, Montana, to have Annie Flahive, the holder of the legal title to a specified tract in that county, adjudged to hold it in trust for him. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained by the district court and, no amendment being asked, judgment was entered for the defendants. This judgment was affirmed by the supreme court of the state (33 Mont. 348), from which court the case was brought here on writ of error.
The facts, as stated in the complaint and attached exhibits, are that plaintiff, with the purpose of entering the land as a homestead, and being qualified therefor, in May, 1882, settled upon, occupied, and fenced the entire tract, with the exception of the north twenty acres thereof. I n addition to a controversy in the Land Department with the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, which claimed the land under its grant, but whose claim was finally rejected, he had a contest in the Land Department with Michael Flahive, who was also seeking to enter the land, which, after several hearings before the local land officers, with appeals to and decisions by the Commissioner of the General Land Office and the Secretary of the Interior, resulted in a final decision against him and an award of the land to the defendant Annie Flahive, the widow of Michael Flahive, who had died pending the proceedings. In pursuance of that award, a patent was issued to her in December, 1899.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Love v. Flahive, 205 U.S. 195 (1907) in 205 U.S. 195 205 U.S. 196–205 U.S. 198. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MFK2ILMXY81J38K.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Love v. Flahive, 205 U.S. 195 (1907), in 205 U.S. 195, pp. 205 U.S. 196–205 U.S. 198. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MFK2ILMXY81J38K.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Love v. Flahive, 205 U.S. 195 (1907). cited in 1907, 205 U.S. 195, pp.205 U.S. 196–205 U.S. 198. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MFK2ILMXY81J38K.
|