Sanford & Brooks Co. v. United States, 267 U.S. 455 (1925)

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 267 U.S. 452, click here.

Sanford & Brooks Co. v. United States


No. 175


Argued January 15, 1925
Decided March 9, 1925
267 U.S. 455

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS

Syllabus

1. Where a government contract for dredging expressly required prompt, written protest against any order for work outside the specifications, written modification of the contract if altered materially, and written orders for extra work, held that oral protests by the contractor, a claim for additional compensation, and a favorable advisory opinion thereon by a government official, were insufficient to establish that these contract provisions were inapplicable or waived, or that a new, oral agreement for compensation quantum meruit was substituted by implication. P. 457.

2. A motion to remand to the Court of Claims for further findings should be submitted at the first term of the entry of the case, so that the Court may determine whether the motion shall be passed upon in advance, or postponed until the hearing on the merits. P. 458.

58 Ct.Cls. 158 affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims rejecting a claim for additional compensation for dredging.