|
Minnesota State Senate v. Beens, 406 U.S. 187 (1972)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Minnesota State Senate v. Beens, 406 U.S. 187 (1972)
Sixty-Seventh Minnesota State Senate v. Beens No. 71-1024 Decided April 29, 1972 * 406 U.S. 187
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Syllabus
A three-judge District Court found that the Minnesota Legislature was malapportioned, and reduced the number of legislative districts from 67, the number established in 1913, to 35, thereby reducing the number of senators by almost 50%, and the number of representatives by nearly 25%. The court declared the entire 1966 apportionment act unconstitutional, and enjoined state officials from conducting elections thereunder, later modifying that injunction so as to enjoin any future elections under any plan other than the one adopted by the court "or a constitutional plan adopted after this date by the State of Minnesota." Appellant, the Minnesota State Senate, intervened in the apportionment challenge below.
Held:
1. The appellant had the right to intervene, as the District Court’s orders directly affected the senate, which is an appropriate legal entity for the purpose of intervention. Silver v. Jordan, 241 F.Supp. 576, aff’d, 381 U.S. 415.
2. The District Court’s injunction with respect to the statutory sections fixing the number of legislative districts and the number of senators and representatives is sufficient to justify a direct appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1253.
3. A federal reapportionment court should accommodate the relief ordered to the appropriate provisions of state statutes relating to the legislature’s size as far as possible, and the action of the District Court here in so drastically changing the number of districts and the size of the houses of the state legislature is not required by the Federal Constitution, and is not justified as an exercise of federal power.
336 F.Supp. 715, vacated and remanded.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Minnesota State Senate v. Beens, 406 U.S. 187 (1972) in 406 U.S. 187 Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LYXQ3BIX2N7ES97.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Minnesota State Senate v. Beens, 406 U.S. 187 (1972), in 406 U.S. 187, Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LYXQ3BIX2N7ES97.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Minnesota State Senate v. Beens, 406 U.S. 187 (1972). cited in 1972, 406 U.S. 187. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LYXQ3BIX2N7ES97.
|