|
|
United States v. Halsey, Stuart & Co., Inc., 296 U.S. 451 (1935)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Halsey, Stuart & Co., Inc., 296 U.S. 451 (1935)
United States v. Halsey, Stuart & Co., Inc. No. 109 Argued December 11, 1935 Decided December 23, 1935 296 U.S. 451
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Syllabus
1. A motion to quash, challenging the sufficiency of an indictment in the light of a bill of particulars, held not special plea in bar within the meaning of the Criminal Appeals Act. P. 452.
2. A judgment sustaining such a motion is not reviewable under the Act when it does not appear that it was based upon the invalidity or construction of the statute upon which the indictment was founded. Id.
Appeal dismissed.
Appeal from an order quashing an indictment charging fraudulent use of the mails. See 4 F.Supp. 662.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Halsey, Stuart & Co., Inc., 296 U.S. 451 (1935) in 296 U.S. 451 Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LQ52NSPZCRINUP1.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Halsey, Stuart & Co., Inc., 296 U.S. 451 (1935), in 296 U.S. 451, Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LQ52NSPZCRINUP1.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Halsey, Stuart & Co., Inc., 296 U.S. 451 (1935). cited in 1935, 296 U.S. 451. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LQ52NSPZCRINUP1.
|