|
|
Califano v. Jobst, 434 U.S. 47 (1977)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Califano v. Jobst, 434 U.S. 47 (1977)
Califano v. Jobst No. 76-860 Argued October 4, 1977 Decided November 8, 1977 434 U.S. 47
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Syllabus
Provisions of the Social Security Act specifying that secondary benefits under the Act received by a disabled dependent child of a covered wage earner shall terminate when the child marries an individual who is not entitled to benefits under the Act, even though that individual is permanently disabled, held not to violate the principle of equality embodied in the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Pp. 50-58.
(a) The general rule that entitlement to a child’s statutory benefits terminates upon marriage is rational. Congress, in lieu of requiring individualized proof of dependency on a case-by-case basis, could assume that marital status is a relevant test of probable dependency, a married person being less likely than an unmarried person to be dependent on his parents for support. Pp. 52-54.
(b) The exception provided for disabled children who marry individuals entitled to benefits under the Act to the general rule that marriage terminates a child’s statutory benefits is likewise rational. That exception, which is a reliable indicator of probable hardship, requires no individualized inquiry into degrees of need or periodic review to determine continued entitlement. Moreover, Congress could reasonably take one step to eliminate hardship caused by the general marriage rule without at the same time accomplishing its entire objective. Williamson v. Lee Optical Co., 348 U.S. 483. Pp. 54-58.
368 F.Supp. 909, reversed.
STEVENS, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Califano v. Jobst, 434 U.S. 47 (1977) in 434 U.S. 47 434 U.S. 48. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=L5FMVSFITIKS2WR.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Califano v. Jobst, 434 U.S. 47 (1977), in 434 U.S. 47, page 434 U.S. 48. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=L5FMVSFITIKS2WR.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Califano v. Jobst, 434 U.S. 47 (1977). cited in 1977, 434 U.S. 47, pp.434 U.S. 48. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=L5FMVSFITIKS2WR.
|