|
|
Ibew v. Foust, 442 U.S. 42 (1979)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Ibew v. Foust, 442 U.S. 42 (1979)
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Foust No. 78-38 Argued February 26, 1979 Decided May 29, 1979 442 U.S. 42
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Respondent was discharged by his employer, the Union Pacific Railroad Co., for failing properly to request an extension of his medical leave of absence. Petitioner union filed a grievance on respondent’s behalf two days after the time for submission had expired. The National Railroad Adjustment Board denied respondent’s claim on the ground that the union had not complied with the filing deadline. Respondent then brought an unfair representation suit against the union. A jury found for respondent, awarding him actual and punitive damages. The Court of Appeals affirmed in most respects, but remanded the case for consideration of whether the punitive damages award was excessive.
Held: The Railway Labor Act does not permit an employee to recover punitive damages for a union’s breach of its duty of fair representation in processing an employee’s grievance against his employer for wrongful discharge. Pp. 46-52.
(a) Since Congress has not specified what remedies are available in unfair representation actions, this Court’s function is to implement a remedial scheme that will best effectuate the purposes of the Railway Labor Act, recognizing that the overarching legislative goal is to facilitate collective bargaining and to achieve industrial peace. Pp. 47-48.
(b) The fundamental purpose of unfair representation suits is to compensate for injuries caused by violations of employees’ rights. To permit punitive damages, which, by definition, provide monetary relief in excess of actual loss, could impair the financial stability of unions and unsettle the careful balance of individual and collective interests which this Court has struck in the unfair representation area. Additionally, the prospect of punitive damages could curtail the broad discretion afforded unions in handling grievances and thereby inhibit the proper functioning of the collective bargaining system. Inflicting such risks on employees, whose welfare depends on the strength of their unions, is too great a price for whatever deterrent effect punitive damages may have. Pp. 48-52.
572 F.2d 710, reversed in part.
MARSHALL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BRENNAN, STEWART, WHITE, and POWELL, JJ., joined. BLACKMUN, J., filed an opinion concurring in the result, in which BURGER, C.J., and REHNQUIST and STEVENS, JJ., joined, post, p. 52.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Ibew v. Foust, 442 U.S. 42 (1979) in 442 U.S. 42 442 U.S. 43. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=L2Q2JJJUN6UJ5B6.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Ibew v. Foust, 442 U.S. 42 (1979), in 442 U.S. 42, page 442 U.S. 43. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=L2Q2JJJUN6UJ5B6.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Ibew v. Foust, 442 U.S. 42 (1979). cited in 1979, 442 U.S. 42, pp.442 U.S. 43. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=L2Q2JJJUN6UJ5B6.
|