|
|
Kipley v. Illinois, 170 U.S. 183 (1898)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Kipley v. Illinois, 170 U.S. 183 (1898)
Kipley v. Illinois Nos. 586 , 601 Submitted March 14, 1898 Decided April 18, 1898 170 U.S. 183
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Syllabus
When the jurisdiction of this Court is invoked for the protection, against the final judgment of the highest court of a state, of some title, right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States, it must appear expressly or by necessary intendment from the record that such right, title, privilege or immunity was specially "set up or claimed" under such Constitution or laws, as the jurisdiction of this Court cannot arise in such case from inference, but only from averments so distinct and positive as to place it beyond question that the party bringing the case up intended to assert a federal right.
Motion to dismiss. The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Kipley v. Illinois, 170 U.S. 183 (1898) in 170 U.S. 183 Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KZHB8J19Q95IHIG.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Kipley v. Illinois, 170 U.S. 183 (1898), in 170 U.S. 183, Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KZHB8J19Q95IHIG.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Kipley v. Illinois, 170 U.S. 183 (1898). cited in 1898, 170 U.S. 183. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KZHB8J19Q95IHIG.
|