|
Levindale Lead & Zinc Mining Co. v. Coleman, 241 U.S. 432 (1916)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Levindale Lead & Zinc Mining Co. v. Coleman, 241 U.S. 432 (1916)
Levindale Lead & Zinc Mining Company v. Coleman No. 322 Argued April 25, 1916 Decided June 5, 1916 241 U.S. 432
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Syllabus
A statute should, if possible, be construed in the light of its obvious policy, and, as restrictions against alienation of Indian allotments evince a continuance of the policy of guardianship over Indians which does not embrace persons not of Indian blood, it would require clear language to show an intent to impose restriction on allotted lands of non-Indians even if inherited from Indians.
Restrictions such as those contained in the Osage Indian Allotment Act of 1906 do not run with the land until they attach, and then only in accord with the intendment of the Act.
A legislative declaration of the intent of a previous act is not absolutely controlling, and ,in this case, held that later acts of Congress in regard to Osage Indian allotments did not attempt to import into the earlier act a restriction which lay wholly outside of its express terms and the policy it was intended to execute.
The restriction on alienation provisions of the Osage Indian Allotment Act of June 28, 1906, c. 3572, 34 Stat. 539, do not apply to lands, or interests in lands, coming lawfully into ownership of white men who are nonmembers of the Osage tribe.
43 Okl. 13 reversed.
The facts, which involve rights of a white heir of an Osage Indian to the allotment of the latter, and the construction of the Act of June 28, 1906, under which the allotment was made, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Levindale Lead & Zinc Mining Co. v. Coleman, 241 U.S. 432 (1916) in 241 U.S. 432 241 U.S. 433. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KQUXEP982I1T5S5.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Levindale Lead & Zinc Mining Co. v. Coleman, 241 U.S. 432 (1916), in 241 U.S. 432, page 241 U.S. 433. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KQUXEP982I1T5S5.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Levindale Lead & Zinc Mining Co. v. Coleman, 241 U.S. 432 (1916). cited in 1916, 241 U.S. 432, pp.241 U.S. 433. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KQUXEP982I1T5S5.
|