|
United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. 441 (1973)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. 441 (1973)
United States v. Basye No. 71-1022 Argued December 11, 1972 Decided February 27, 1973 410 U.S. 441
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
A medical partnership (Permanente), in which respondent physicians were partners, made an agreement to supply medical services to members of a health foundation (Kaiser). A portion of Kaiser’s compensation to Permanente was in the form of payments into a retirement trust for the benefit of Permanente’s physicians, none of whom was eligible to receive the amounts in his tentative account prior to retirement after specified years of service. No interest in the account was deemed to vest in a particular beneficiary before retirement, and a physician’s pre-retirement severance from Permanente would occasion the forfeiture of his interest, with redistribution to the remaining participants. Under no circumstances, however, could Kaiser recoup the payments once made. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed a deficiency against each partner respondent for his distributive share of the amount paid by Kaiser, which he had not reported as taxable income. In this refund suit the District Court, with the Court of Appeals affirming, held that the payments to the fund were not income to the partnership because it did not receive and had no "right to receive" them.
Held: The retirement fund payments, notwithstanding the fact that they were contributed directly to the trust, were compensation for services that Permanente rendered under the medical service agreement, and should have been reported as income to Permanente; and the individual partners should have included their shares of that income in their individual returns, since the existence of conditions upon the actual receipt by a partner of income fully earned by the partnership is not a relevant factor in determining its taxability to him. Pp. 448-457.
450 F.2d 109, reversed and remanded.
POWELL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and BRENNAN, STEWART, WHITE, MARSHALL, BLACKMUN, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. DOUGLAS, J., dissented.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. 441 (1973) in 410 U.S. 441 410 U.S. 442. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KN8925B6FY69XLD.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. 441 (1973), in 410 U.S. 441, page 410 U.S. 442. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KN8925B6FY69XLD.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. 441 (1973). cited in 1973, 410 U.S. 441, pp.410 U.S. 442. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KN8925B6FY69XLD.
|