On Chemical Synthesis
John Dalton
When any body exists in the elastic state, its ultimate particles are separated from each other to a much greater distance than in any other state; each particle occupies the centre of a comparatively large sphere, and supports its dignity by keeping all the rest, which by their gravity, or otherwise, are disposed to encroach upon it, at a respectful distance. When we attempt to conceive the number of particles in an atmosphere, it is somewhat like attempting to conceive the number of stars in the universe. We are confounded with the thought. But if we limit the subject, by taking a given volume of any gas, we seem persuaded that, let the divisions be ever so minute, the number of particles must be finite; just as in a given space of the universe, the number of stars and planets cannot be infinite.
Chemical analysis and synthesis go no farther than to the separation of particles one from another, and to their reunion. No new creation or destruction of matter is within the reach of chemical agency. We might as well attempt to introduce a new planet into the solar system, or to annihilate one already in eixstence, as to create or destroy a particle of hydrogen. All the changes we can produce, consist in separating particles that are in a state of cohesion or combination, and joining those that were previously at a distance.
In all chemical investigations it has justly been considered an important object to ascertain the relative weights of the simples which constitute a compound. But unfortunately the inquiry has terminated here; whereas from the relative weights in the mass, the relative weights of the ultimate particles or atoms of the bodies might have been inferred, from which their number and weight in various other compounds would appear, in order to assist and to guide future investigations, and to correct their results. Now it is one great object of this work to show the importance and advantage of ascertaining the relative weights of the ultimate particles, both of simple and compound bodies, the number of simple elementary particles which constitute one compound particle, and the number of less compound particles which enter into the formation of one more compound particle.
If there are two bodies, A and B, which are disposed to combine, the following is the order in which the combinations may take place, beginning with the most simple: namely,
1 atom of A + 1 atom of B=1 atom of C, binary.
1 atom of A + 2 atoms of B=1 atom of D, ternary.
2 atoms of A + 1 atom of B=1 atom of E, ternary.
1 atom of A + 3 atoms of B=1 atom of F, quaternary.
3 atoms of A + 1 atom of B=1 atom of G, quaternary. etc., etc.
The following general rules may be adopted as guides in all our investigations respecting chemical synthesis:
1st. When only one combination of two bodies can be obtained, it must be presumed to be a binary one, unless some cause appear to the contrary.
2d. When two combinations are observed, they must be presumed to be a binary and a ternary.
3d. When three combinations are obtained, we may expect one to be a binary, and the other two ternary.
4th. When four combinations are observed, we should expect one binary, two ternary, and one quaternary, etc.
5th. A binary compound should always be specifically heavier than the mere mixture of its two ingredients.
6th. A ternary compound should be specifically heavier than the mixture of a binary and a simple, which would, if combined, constitute it; etc.
7th. The above rules and observations equally apply, when two bodies, such as C and D, D and E, etc., are combined.
From the application of these rules, to the chemical facts already well ascertained, we deduce the following conclusions; 1st. That water is a binary compound of hydrogen and oxygen, and the relative weights of the two elementary atoms are as 1 : 7, nearly; 2d. That ammonia is a binary compound of hydrogen and azote, and the relative weights of the two atoms are as 1 : 5, nearly; 3d. That nitrous gas is a binary compound of azote and oxygen, the atoms of which weigh 5 and 7 respectively; that nitric acid is a binary or ternary compound according as it is derived, and consists of one atom of azote and two of oxygen, together weighing 19; that nitrous oxide is a compound similar to nitric acid, and consists of one atom of oxygen and two of azote, weighing 17; that nitrous acid is a binary compound of nitric acid and nitrous gas, weighing 31; that oxynitric acid is a binary compound of nitric acid and oxygen, weighing 26; 4th. That carbonic oxide is a binary compound; consisting of one atom of charcoal, and one of oxygen, together weighing nearly 12; that carbonic acid is a ternary compound (but sometimes binary), consisting of one atom of charcoal, and two of oxygen, weighing 19; etc., etc. In all these cases the weights are expressed in atoms of hydrogen, each of which is denoted by unity.
In the sequel, the facts and experiments from which these conclusions are derived, will be detailed; as well as a great variety of others from which are inferred the constitution and weight of the ultimate particles of the principal acids, the alkalies, the earths, the metals, the metallic oxides and sulphurets, the long train of neutral salts, and in short, all the chemical compounds which have hitherto obtained a tolerably good analysis. Several of the conclusions will be supported by original experiments.
From the novelty as well as importance of the ideas suggested in this chapter, it is deemed expedient to give plates, exhibiting the mode of combination in some of the more simple cases. A specimen of these accompanies this first part. The elements or atoms of such bodies as are conceived at present to be simple, are denoted by a small circle, with some distinctive mark; and the combinations consist in the juxtaposition of two or more of these; when three or more particles of elastic fluids are combined together in one, it is to be supposed that the particles of the same kind repel each other, and therefore take their stations accordingly.
This plate [on the following page] contains the arbitrary marks or signs chosen to represent the several chemical elements or ultimate particles.
xyzFig. Fig.
1 Hydrog. its tel. weight 1 11 Strontites 46
2 Azote 5 12 Barytes 68
3 Carbone or charcoal 5 13 Iron 38<.b/>4 Oxygen 7 14 Zinc 56
5 Phosphorus 9 15 Copper 56
6 Sulphur 13 16 Lead 95
7 Magnesia 20 17 Silver 100
8 Lime 23 18 Platina 100
9 Soda 28 19 Gold 140
10 Potash 42 20 Mercury 167
21. An atom of water or steam, composed of 1 of oxygen and 1of hydrogen, retained in physical contact by a strong affinity, and supposed to be surrounded by a common atmosphere of heat; its relative weight = 8
22. An atom of ammonia, composed of 1 of azote and 1 of hydrogen = 6
23. An atom of nitrous gas, composed of 1 of azote and 1 of oxy = 12
24. An atom of olefiant gas, composed of 1 of earbone and 1 of hydrogen = 6
Fig. 25. An atom of carbonic oxide composed of 1 of carbone and 1 of oxygen = 12
26. An atom of nitrous oxide, 2 azote + 1 oxygen = 17
27. An atom of nitric acid, 1 azote + 2 oxygen = 19
28. An atom of carbonic acid, 1 carbone + 2 oxygen = 19
29. An atom of carburetted hydrogen, 1 carbone + 2 hydrogen = 7
30. An atom of oxynitric acid, 1 azote + 3 oxygen = 26
31. An atom of sulphurie acid, 1 sulphur + 3 oxygen = 34
32. An atom of sulphuretted hydrogen, 1 sulphur + 3 hydrogen = 16
33. An atom of alcohol, 3 carbone + 1 hydrogen = 16
34. An atom of nitrous acid, 1 nitric acid + 1 nitrous gas = 31
35. An atom of acetous acid, 2 carbone + 2 water = 26
36. An atom of nitrate of ammonia, 1 nitric acid + 1 ammonia + 1water = 33
37. An atom of sugar, 1 alcohol + 1 carbonic acid = 35 [p.374]
Enough has been given to show the method; it will be quite unnecessary to devise characters and combinations of them to exhibit to view in this way all the subjects that come under investigation; nor is it necessary to insist upon the accuracy of all these compounds, both in number and weight; the principle will be entered into more particularly hereafter, as far as respects the individual results. It is not to be understood that all those articles marked as simple substances, are necessarily such by the theory; they are only necessarily of such weights. Soda and potash, such as they are found in combination with acids, are 28 and 42 respectively in weight; but according to Mr. Davy’s very important discoveries, they are metallic oxides; the former then must be considered as composed of an atom of metal, 21, and one of oxygen, 7; and the latter, of an atom of metal, 35, and one of oxygen, 7. Or, soda contains 75 per cent. metal and 25 oxygen; potash, 83.3 metal and 16.7 oxygen. It is particularly remarkable, that according to the above-mentioned gentleman’s essay on the Decomposition and Composition of the fixed alkalies, in the Philosophical Transactions (a copy of which essay he has just favoured me with) it appears that "the largest quantity of oxygen indicated by these experiments was for potash 17, and for soda, 26 parts in 100, and the smallest 13 and 19."