|
|
United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423 (1973)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423 (1973)
United States v. Russell No. 71-1585 Argued February 27, 1973 Decided April 24, 1973 411 U.S. 423
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
An undercover narcotics agent investigating respondent and his confederates for illicitly manufacturing a drug, offered them an essential ingredient which was difficult to obtain, though legally available. After the agent had observed the process and contributed the ingredient in return for a share of the finished product, respondent was found guilty by a jury which had been given the standard entrapment instruction. The Court of Appeals reversed, concluding that there had been "an intolerable degree of governmental participation in the criminal enterprise."
Held: The entrapment defense, which, as explicated in Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, and Sherman v. United States, 356 U.S. 369, prohibits law enforcement officers from instigating criminal acts by otherwise innocent persons in order to lure them to commit crimes and punish them, did not bar the conviction of respondent in view of the evidence of respondent’s involvement in making the drug before and after the agent’s visits, and respondent’s concession "that he may have harbored a predisposition to commit the charged offenses." Nor was the agent’s infiltration of the drug-making operation of such a nature as to violate fundamental principles of due process. Pp. 428-436.
459 F.2d 671, reversed.
REHNQUIST, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and WHITE, BLACKMUN, and POWELL, JJ., joined. DOUGLAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BRENNAN, J., joined, post, p. 436. STEWART, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BRENNAN and MARSHALL, JJ., joined, post, p. 439.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423 (1973) in 411 U.S. 423 411 U.S. 424. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KFTJBL7IZXCL545.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423 (1973), in 411 U.S. 423, page 411 U.S. 424. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KFTJBL7IZXCL545.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423 (1973). cited in 1973, 411 U.S. 423, pp.411 U.S. 424. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KFTJBL7IZXCL545.
|