Terre Haute & Indianapolis R. Co. v. Ketcham, 194 U.S. 579 (1904)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Terre Haute & Indianapolis R. Co. v. Ketcham, 194 U.S. 579 (1904)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 194 U.S. 572, click here.
Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad Company v. Indiana ex Rel. Ketcham No. 264 Argued April 29, May 2, 1904 »Decided May 31, 1904 194 U.S. 579
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Syllabus
Where the. state court has sustained a result which cannot be reached except on what this Court deems a wrong construction of the charter without relying on unconstitutional legislation, this Court cannot decline jurisdiction on writ of error because the state court apparently relied more on the untenable construction than on the unconstitutional statute.
A provision in a charter of a railroad company that the legislature may so regulate tolls that not more than a certain percentage be divided as profits to the stockholders and the surplus shall be paid over to the state treasurer for the use of schools, held in this case to be permissive, and not mandatory, and that, until the state acted or made a demand, the railroad company could act as it saw fit as to its entire earnings.
When, therefore, the company surrendered its original charter and accepted a new one without any such provision, and there had up to that time been no attempt on the part of the state to regulate tolls nor any demand made for surplus earnings, the company was free from liability under the original charter, and subsequent legislation attempting to amend its charter or the general railroad law would not affect its rights.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Terre Haute & Indianapolis R. Co. v. Ketcham, 194 U.S. 579 (1904) in 194 U.S. 579 194 U.S. 585. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=K6WGJ8UPM1TE4CC.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Terre Haute & Indianapolis R. Co. v. Ketcham, 194 U.S. 579 (1904), in 194 U.S. 579, page 194 U.S. 585. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=K6WGJ8UPM1TE4CC.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Terre Haute & Indianapolis R. Co. v. Ketcham, 194 U.S. 579 (1904). cited in 1904, 194 U.S. 579, pp.194 U.S. 585. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=K6WGJ8UPM1TE4CC.
|