Reece v. Georgia, 350 U.S. 85 (1955)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Reece v. Georgia, 350 U.S. 85 (1955)
Reece v. Georgia No. 112 Argued November 9, 1955 Decided December 5, 1955 350 U.S. 85
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA
Syllabus
1. Georgia law requires that objections of a defendant to the composition of a grand jury be raised before indictment. Petitioner, a Negro of low mentality, was indicted and convicted of a capital offense, but was not provided with counsel until the day after he was indicted. Before his arraignment, petitioner moved to quash the indictment on the ground that Negroes had been systematically excluded from service on the grand jury. This motion was denied on the ground that it was made too late.
Held: failure to consider the motion to quash on its merits was a denial of due process of law, and violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Pp. 87-90.
(a) The indictment of a defendant by a grand jury from which members of his race have been systematically excluded is a denial of his right to equal protection of the laws. P. 87.
(b) Where no opportunity to challenge the grand jury selection has been afforded a defendant, his right may be asserted by a plea in abatement or a motion to quash before arraignment. P. 87.
(c) Assignment of counsel in a state prosecution at such time and under such circumstances as to preclude the giving of effective aid in the preparation and trial of a capital case is a denial of due process of law. Pp. 89-90.
2. This case being properly here upon review of the second judgment of the Georgia Supreme Court therein, this Court has jurisdiction to consider all of the substantial federal questions determined in the earlier stages of the litigation, and reexamination of such questions here is unaffected by a ruling of the state court that its first decision became the law of the case. P. 87.
211 Ga. 339, 85 S.E.2d 773, reversed and remanded.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Reece v. Georgia, 350 U.S. 85 (1955) in 350 U.S. 85 350 U.S. 86. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=JUKVHHBZERKZHC4.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Reece v. Georgia, 350 U.S. 85 (1955), in 350 U.S. 85, page 350 U.S. 86. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=JUKVHHBZERKZHC4.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Reece v. Georgia, 350 U.S. 85 (1955). cited in 1955, 350 U.S. 85, pp.350 U.S. 86. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=JUKVHHBZERKZHC4.
|