|
|
Carafas v. Lavallee, 391 U.S. 234 (1968)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Carafas v. Lavallee, 391 U.S. 234 (1968)
Carafas v. LaVallee No. 71 Argued March 27, 1968 Decided May 20, 1968 391 U.S. 234
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Syllabus
In 1960, petitioner was convicted in New York state criminal proceedings and his sentence was affirmed on appeal without opinion over his contention that illegally obtained evidence had been introduced against him at his trial. Renewing that claim, petitioner thereafter sought relief in the federal and state courts by writ of habeas corpus. The petition in the present case was filed in June, 1963, while petitioner was in custody. On November 5, 1965, the District Court, after a hearing on the merits ordered by the Court of Appeals, dismissed the petition. The District Court issued a certificate of probable cause. A notice of appeal was filed, and the petitioner made application in the Court of Appeals for an order allowing him to appeal in forma pauperis. The State opposed the application and moved to dismiss the appeal as without merit. Petitioner, replying, opposed the motion to dismiss and renewed his application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court of Appeals entered the following order with respect thereto: "Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Application denied. Motion to dismiss appeal granted." On March 6, 1967, about two weeks after the Court of Appeals denied a rehearing, petitioner’s sentence expired and he was released from custody. On March 20, 1967, petitioner filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in this Court, which was granted October 16, 1967. Respondent contends that expiration of petitioner’s sentence has mooted the case and that, in any event, petitioner was not wrongfully denied a full appeal by the Court of Appeals after the District Court had granted a certificate of probable cause.
Held:
1. The case is not moot. Pp. 237-240.
(a) Because of the "disabilities or burdens [which] may flow from" petitioner’s conviction, he has "a substantial stake in the judgment of conviction which survives the satisfaction of the sentence imposed on him." Fiswick v. United States, 329 U.S. 211, 222 (1946). Pp. 237-238.
(b) Under the federal habeas corpus statutory scheme, once federal jurisdiction has attached in the District Court, it is not defeated by petitioner’s release before completion of the proceedings on the application. Though the federal habeas corpus statute requires that the applicant be "in custody" when the habeas corpus application is filed, the relief that may be granted is not limited to discharging the applicant from physical custody, the statute providing that "the court shall . . . dispose of the matter as law and justice require." 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Parker v. Ellis, 362 U.S. 574 (1960), overruled. Pp. 238-240.
2. Where a certificate of probable cause has been granted, the court of appeals must allow an appeal in forma pauperis (assuming a requisite showing of poverty), must consider the appeal on its merits, and must include in its order enough to demonstrate the basis for its action, as this Court held in Nowakowski v. Maroney, 386 U.S. 542. That case, though decided after the Court of Appeals’ summary dismissal of petitioner’s appeal, governs this case which had not been concluded at the time of that decision. Pp. 240-242.
Vacated and remanded.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Carafas v. Lavallee, 391 U.S. 234 (1968) in 391 U.S. 234 391 U.S. 235. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=J7ALJVZTTY468M7.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Carafas v. Lavallee, 391 U.S. 234 (1968), in 391 U.S. 234, page 391 U.S. 235. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=J7ALJVZTTY468M7.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Carafas v. Lavallee, 391 U.S. 234 (1968). cited in 1968, 391 U.S. 234, pp.391 U.S. 235. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=J7ALJVZTTY468M7.
|