|
Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375 (1955)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375 (1955)
Witmer v. United States No. 164 Argued February 1, 1955 Decided March 14, 1955 348 U.S. 375
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. Petitioner, a member of Jehovah’s Witnesses, was convicted of failing to submit to induction into the armed forces in violation of § 12(a) of the Universal Military Training and Service Act.
Held: on the record in this case, this Court cannot find that there was no basis in fact for the Appeal Board’s decision denying petitioner classification as a conscientious objector, and his conviction is affirmed. Dickinson v. United States, 346 U.S. 389, distinguished. Pp. 376-383.
(a) In conscientious objector cases, the ultimate question is the sincerity of the registrant in objecting, on religious grounds, to participation in war in any form. Pp. 381-382.
(b) Petitioner’s inconsistent statements were sufficient to cast doubt on the sincerity of his claim. Pp. 382-383.
2. After petitioner’s application for classification as a farmer and a conscientious objector had been denied, he applied to the Local Board for classification as a minister of the gospel, and appeared before the Board and submitted evidence in support of this claim. Before forwarding the case to the Appeal Board, the Local Board in fact considered this claim and advised petitioner of his continuance in the I-A classification.
Held: this satisfied the requirement of § 1624.2(b) and (c) of the Selective Service Regulations that the case be reopened and the registrant reclassified, though the Board’s records did not use the words "reopen" or "reclassify." Pp. 383-384.
213 F.2d 95 affirmed.
Petitioner was convicted of failing to submit to induction into the armed forces in violation of § 12(a) of the Universal Military Training and Service Act. 115 F. Supp. 19. The Court of Appeals affirmed. 213 F.2d 95. This Court granted certiorari. 348 U.S. 812. Affirmed, p. 384.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375 (1955) in 348 U.S. 375 348 U.S. 376. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=IYH9KG2GSGJGA9E.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375 (1955), in 348 U.S. 375, page 348 U.S. 376. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=IYH9KG2GSGJGA9E.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375 (1955). cited in 1955, 348 U.S. 375, pp.348 U.S. 376. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=IYH9KG2GSGJGA9E.
|