|
|
Arteaga v. United States Court of Appeals, 522 U.S. 446 (1998)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Arteaga v. United States Court of Appeals, 522 U.S. 446 (1998)
Arteaga v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit No. 97-6749 Decided February 23, 1998 522 U.S. 446
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Syllabus
Held: abusive filer’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and, for the reasons discussed in Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 501 U.S. 1, he is barred from filing any further certiorari petitions in noncriminal matters unless he first pays the required docketing fees and submits his petition in compliance with Rule 33.1.
Motion denied.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Arteaga v. United States Court of Appeals, 522 U.S. 446 (1998) in 522 U.S. 446 Original Sources, accessed August 1, 2025, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=IQ8HCMPVN7AAV5Q.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Arteaga v. United States Court of Appeals, 522 U.S. 446 (1998), in 522 U.S. 446, Original Sources. 1 Aug. 2025. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=IQ8HCMPVN7AAV5Q.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Arteaga v. United States Court of Appeals, 522 U.S. 446 (1998). cited in 1998, 522 U.S. 446. Original Sources, retrieved 1 August 2025, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=IQ8HCMPVN7AAV5Q.
|