|
Nlrb v. International Van Lines, 409 U.S. 48 (1972)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Nlrb v. International Van Lines, 409 U.S. 48 (1972)
National Labor Relations Board v. International Van Lines No. 71-895 Argued October 12, 1972 Decided November 7, 1972 409 U.S. 48
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Four employees of respondent refused to cross a picket line formed in connection with a union’s organization campaign. Respondent thereafter advised the employees that because of their failure to report to work they were being permanently replaced, which was not true at the time of the discharges. When respondent refused reinstatement, charges were filed with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Concluding that the discharges were unfair labor practices under the National Labor Relations Act, and that the employees thereby became unfair labor practice strikers, the NLRB ordered unconditional reinstatement with back pay. The Court of Appeals reversed that portion of the NLRB’s order, holding that the employees were not unfair labor practice strikers, who were entitled to unconditional reinstatement, but economic strikers, who were not entitled to reinstatement if the employer had substantial business justifications for refusing to rehire them.
Held: The unconditional reinstatement of the employees was proper, since their discriminatory discharges prior to the time their places were filled constituted unfair labor practices regardless of whether they were economic strikers or unfair labor practice strikers. Pp. 52-53.
448 F.2d 905, reversed in part.
STEWART, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C. J., and DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. BLACKMUN, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, post, p. 53.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Nlrb v. International Van Lines, 409 U.S. 48 (1972) in 409 U.S. 48 409 U.S. 49. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=I6SYIZ588QLNR2J.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Nlrb v. International Van Lines, 409 U.S. 48 (1972), in 409 U.S. 48, page 409 U.S. 49. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=I6SYIZ588QLNR2J.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Nlrb v. International Van Lines, 409 U.S. 48 (1972). cited in 1972, 409 U.S. 48, pp.409 U.S. 49. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=I6SYIZ588QLNR2J.
|