|
Londoner v. Denver, 210 U.S. 373 (1908)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Londoner v. Denver, 210 U.S. 373 (1908)
Londoner v. Denver No. 157 Argued March 6, 9, 1908 Decided June 1, 1908 210 U.S. 373
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Syllabus
The legislature of a state may authorize municipal improvements without any petition of landowners to be assessed therefor, and proceedings of a municipality in accordance with charter provisions and without hearings authorizing an improvement do not deny due process of law to landowners who are afforded a hearing upon the assessment itself.
The decision of a state court that a city council properly determined that the board of public works had acted within its jurisdiction under the city charter does not involve a federal question reviewable by this Court.
Where the state court has construed a state statute so as to bring it into harmony with the federal and state constitutions, nothing in the Fourteenth Amendment gives this Court power to review the decision on the ground that the state court exercised legislative power in construing the statute in that manner, and thereby violated that Amendment.
There are few constitutional restrictions on the power of the states to assess, apportion, and collect taxes, and in the enforcement of such restrictions, this Court has regard to substance, and not form, but where the legislature commits the determination of the tax to a subordinate body, due process of law requires that the taxpayer he afforded a hearing of which he must have notice, and this requirement is not satisfied by the mere right to file objections, and where, as in Colorado, the taxpayer has no right to object to an assessment in court, due process of law a guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment require that he have the opportunity to support his objections by argument and proof at some time and place.
The denial of due process of law by municipal authorities while acting as a board of equalization amounts to a denial by the state.
33 Colo. 104 reversed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Londoner v. Denver, 210 U.S. 373 (1908) in 210 U.S. 373 210 U.S. 374. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=I3QKC8QB1VEDTEK.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Londoner v. Denver, 210 U.S. 373 (1908), in 210 U.S. 373, page 210 U.S. 374. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=I3QKC8QB1VEDTEK.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Londoner v. Denver, 210 U.S. 373 (1908). cited in 1908, 210 U.S. 373, pp.210 U.S. 374. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=I3QKC8QB1VEDTEK.
|