Bryan v. Ker, 222 U.S. 107 (1911)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Bryan v. Ker, 222 U.S. 107 (1911)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 222 U.S. 96, click here.
Bryan v. Ker No. 3 Argued October 25, 26, 1911 Decided November 20, 1911 222 U.S. 107
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Although a writ which the court has power to issue in a proper case may have been irregularly issued, the marshal is authorized and bound to act thereunder if it comes into his hands as an apparently valid writ.
Although the attempted delegation of authority may have been ineffectual to clothe the person signing a writ with power to do so, the marshal is protected in executing it if it is in the usual form and bears the seal of the court; such an irregularity can be cured by amendment substituting the signature of the person properly authorized.
If process in rem is apparently valid and it does not appear on the face thereof that the libel on which it is issued discloses only a personal action for damages, the marshal is protected in executing it.
A collector of the port cannot be held responsible for detention of a vessel because he places an inspector thereon with orders to detain her if she attempts to sail if, at the time, the vessel is validly in custody of the marshal and the inspector is withdrawn before the possession of the marshal terminates.
163 F. 233 reversed.
The facts, which involve the validity of process of the district court and the power and duty of the marshal thereunder, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Bryan v. Ker, 222 U.S. 107 (1911) in 222 U.S. 107 222 U.S. 108–222 U.S. 110. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=I3GDIRU9INSEJQC.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Bryan v. Ker, 222 U.S. 107 (1911), in 222 U.S. 107, pp. 222 U.S. 108–222 U.S. 110. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=I3GDIRU9INSEJQC.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Bryan v. Ker, 222 U.S. 107 (1911). cited in 1911, 222 U.S. 107, pp.222 U.S. 108–222 U.S. 110. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=I3GDIRU9INSEJQC.
|