|
|
William of Malmesbury’s Chronicle of the Kings of England
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General Summaryn/a WILLIAM of Malmesbury, the best English historian of the twelfth century, was of mixed English and Norman blood. For this reason he found it possible to judge fairly between the conquerors and the conquered, who, when he wrote, were gradually blending into one nation. William spent most of his life as a monk at Malmesbury, where he produced the historical compositions which gave him a high reputation among scholars. His most important book was a Chronicle of the Kings of England. It covers the years 449–1127, that is, the period from the beginning of the Anglo-Saxon conquest to nearly the close of the reign of the Norman king, Henry I. The earlier part of the work does not add very much to our knowledge, but from 1066 onward much material of historical interest can be gleaned from its pages.
Chapter XXXII William the Conqueror and the Normans in England1
162. Negotiations of William and Harold2
After the death of Edward the Confessor, England, fluctuating with doubtful favor, was uncertain to which ruler she should commit herself: to Harold, William, or Edgar:3 for the king had recommended the last-mentioned also to the nobility, as nearest to the sovereignty in point of birth. Wherefore the
English were distracted in their choice, although all of them openly wished well to Harold. He, indeed, once dignified with the diadem, thought nothing of the covenant between himself and William. He said that he was absolved from his oath, because William’s daughter, to whom he had been betrothed, had died before she was marriageable. . . . Moreover, supposing that the threats of William would never be put into execution, because he was occupied in wars with neighboring princes, Harold had, with his subjects, given full indulgence to security. Indeed, if he had not heard that the king of Norway was approaching, he would neither have condescended to collect troops nor to array them.
William, in the meantime, began mildly to address him by messengers; to expostulate on the broken covenant; to mingle threats with entreaties; and to warn him that, ere a year expired, he would claim his due by the sword. . . . Harold again rejoined what I have related concerning the nuptials of his daughter and added that William had been precipitate on the subject of the kingdom, in having confirmed to him by oath another’s right, without the universal consent and edict of the Witenagemot and of the people; and, finally, that a rash oath ought to be broken. . . . In this way, confounded by either true or plausible arguments, the messengers returned without success.
1 , the translation by John Sharpe, revised by J. A. Giles. London, 1847. George Bell and Sons.
2 William of Malmesbury, Gesta regum Anglorum, bk. iii.
3 Edgar, called the Ætheling, was a grandson of the English king Edmund Ironside.
Chicago: John Sharpe, trans., William of Malmesbury’s Chronicle of the Kings of England in Readings in Early European History, ed. Webster, Hutton (Boston: Ginn and Company, 1926), 340. Original Sources, accessed October 27, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=I2FSCCY9246VQ1X.
MLA: . William of Malmesbury’s Chronicle of the Kings of England, translted by John Sharpe, in Readings in Early European History, edited by Webster, Hutton, Boston, Ginn and Company, 1926, page 340. Original Sources. 27 Oct. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=I2FSCCY9246VQ1X.
Harvard: (trans.), William of Malmesbury’s Chronicle of the Kings of England. cited in 1926, Readings in Early European History, ed. , Ginn and Company, Boston, pp.340. Original Sources, retrieved 27 October 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=I2FSCCY9246VQ1X.
|