Leary v. United States, 224 U.S. 567 (1912)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Leary v. United States, 224 U.S. 567 (1912)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 224 U.S. 564, click here.
Leary v. United States No. 508 Argued April 29, 30, 1912 Decided May 13, 1912 224 U.S. 567
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
In a suit brought by the United States to charge the defendant with a trust in respect to funds obtained by another through fraud against the United States, held that the personal representative of a third party claiming an interest in the funds under an agreement indemnifying him as bail of the party fraudulently procuring such funds was, under the circumstances of this case, entitled to intervene.
A contract that certain specific assets in the hands of a trustee should be held as security for a specific contingent claim is necessarily express, and is nonetheless so if conveyed by acts importing it than if stated in words.
Where the intervenor has not legal title and is not claiming against an admitted prior equity as a purchaser without notice, allegations of ignorance of facts not admitted and not finally established are not essential.
Bail no longer is the mundium, and distinctions between bail and suretyship are nearly effaced. Quaere whether a contract to indemnify bail which is legal by statute in New York where made is void as against the public policy of the United States.
In this case, as the intervenor did not know of the suit or the position taken by defendant, who was legally her trustee, she should not be held guilty of laches.
184 F. 433 reversed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Leary v. United States, 224 U.S. 567 (1912) in 224 U.S. 567 224 U.S. 568–224 U.S. 573. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HXDEAZQ6FE5ARSK.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Leary v. United States, 224 U.S. 567 (1912), in 224 U.S. 567, pp. 224 U.S. 568–224 U.S. 573. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HXDEAZQ6FE5ARSK.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Leary v. United States, 224 U.S. 567 (1912). cited in 1912, 224 U.S. 567, pp.224 U.S. 568–224 U.S. 573. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HXDEAZQ6FE5ARSK.
|