|
United States v. Borden Co., 347 U.S. 514 (1954)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Borden Co., 347 U.S. 514 (1954)
United States v. Borden Company No. 464 Argued April 27, 1954 Decided May 17, 1954 347 U.S. 514
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Syllabus
In a civil proceeding brought by the United States against several Chicago dairies, the complaint charged a conspiracy to restrain and monopolize the sale of fluid milk in the Chicago area, in violation of the Sherman Act, and price discrimination in violation of the Clayton Act. The District Court dismissed the complaint, holding that, as to the alleged Sherman Act violations, the evidence failed to establish the existence of a conspiracy, and that, though there was proof of price discrimination violative of the Clayton Act by certain of the defendants, a prior decree of that court in a private antitrust suit by a competitor enjoined the conduct in question and made it "useless" to award the Government an injunction.
Held:
1. Rulings by the district judge that certain evidence offered by the Government was inadmissible did not affect the substantial rights of the parties within the meaning of 28 U.S. C. § 2111, since it does not appear that admission of the evidence in question would have been sufficient to change the conclusion that the Government had not established a case under the Sherman Act, and, on that basis, the judgment of dismissal as to the Sherman Act allegations is affirmed. Pp. 516-517.
2. In view of the difference in the respective interests sought to be vindicated by the Government and by private litigants in Clayton Act proceedings, the district judge abused his discretion in refusing the Government injunctive relief against price discrimination violative of the Clayton Act solely because of the existence of a prior decree entered in a private action. Pp. 517-520.
111 F.Supp. 562 affirmed in part and remanded.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Borden Co., 347 U.S. 514 (1954) in 347 U.S. 514 347 U.S. 515. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HPNCA4VEA754TJT.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Borden Co., 347 U.S. 514 (1954), in 347 U.S. 514, page 347 U.S. 515. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HPNCA4VEA754TJT.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Borden Co., 347 U.S. 514 (1954). cited in 1954, 347 U.S. 514, pp.347 U.S. 515. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HPNCA4VEA754TJT.
|