Southwestern Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Danaher, 238 U.S. 482 (1915)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Southwestern Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Danaher, 238 U.S. 482 (1915)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 238 U.S. 473, click here.
Southwestern Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Danaher No. 43 Submitted March 17, 1914 Restored to docket April 6, 1914 Reargued April 22, 1914 Decided June 21, 1915 238 U.S. 482
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS
Syllabus
While it is not open in this Court to revise the construction placed on a state statute by the state court, it is open to determine whether the application of the statute as so construed is so arbitrary as to so contravene the fundamental principles of justice as to amount to deprivation of property without due process of law.
The rates of public service corporations, such as telephone companies, are fixed in expectation that they will be paid, and reasonable regulations tending towards prompt payment are necessary as the ability of such corporation to serve the public depends upon the prompt collection of their rates.
Collection of such rates by legal process being practically prohibitive, regulations requiring payment in advance are not unreasonable, and a telephone company is not subject to penalties for refusing to render service to a subscriber who is delinquent on past rates and refuse to pay in advance in accordance with an established rule uniformly enforced, or because it charges the full price to a subscriber who does not pay in advance, while allowing a stated discount to those who do pay in advance.
To enforce against a telephone company a penalty for refusing to furnish service under such condition amounts to depriving it of its property without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
102 Ark. 547 reversed.
The facts, which involve the constitutionality under the Fourteenth Amendment of a statute of Arkansas relating to telephone companies, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Southwestern Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Danaher, 238 U.S. 482 (1915) in 238 U.S. 482 238 U.S. 483–238 U.S. 485. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HMMQKIWP9KT37G8.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Southwestern Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Danaher, 238 U.S. 482 (1915), in 238 U.S. 482, pp. 238 U.S. 483–238 U.S. 485. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HMMQKIWP9KT37G8.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Southwestern Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Danaher, 238 U.S. 482 (1915). cited in 1915, 238 U.S. 482, pp.238 U.S. 483–238 U.S. 485. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HMMQKIWP9KT37G8.
|