|
|
Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605 (1950)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605 (1950)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 339 U.S. 594, click here.
Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. No. 2 Argued March 30, 1950 Decided May 29, 1950 339 U.S. 605
ON REHEARING
Syllabus
1. This Court affirms the finding of the two courts below that, under the doctrine of equivalents, certain flux claims of Jones patent No. 2,043,960, for an electric welding process and for fluxes, or compositions, to be used therewith were infringed. Pp. 606-612.
2. The essence of the doctrine of equivalents is that one may not practice a fraud on a patent. P. 608.
3. The doctrine of equivalents is founded on the theory that, if two devices do the same work in substantially the same way and accomplish substantially the same result, they are the same, even though they differ in name, form or shape. Pp. 608-609.
4. In determining equivalents, consideration must be given to the purpose for which an ingredient is used in a patent, the qualities it has when combined with other ingredients, the functions which it is intended to perform, and whether persons reasonably skilled in the art would have known of the interchangeability of an ingredient not contained in the patent with one that was. P. 609.
5. A finding of equivalence is a determination of fact to be made by the trial court, and the trial court’s decision should not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous. Pp. 609-610.
6. On the record in this case, involving a claim of a combination of alkaline earth metal silicate and calcium fluoride, the trial court was justified in finding that the substitution in the accused composition of manganese silicate (which is not an alkaline earth metal silicate) for magnesium silicate (which is an alkaline earth metal silicate), where the two compositions were substantially identical in operation and result, was so insubstantial, in view of the technology and the prior art, that the patent was infringed under the doctrine of equivalents. Pp. 610-612.
The history of the case is summarized in the first paragraph of the opinion. On the aspect of the case involved in the rehearing, the prior decision of this Court is adhered to, p. 612.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605 (1950) in 339 U.S. 605 339 U.S. 606. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HJLUKMA8IVU6ZV3.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605 (1950), in 339 U.S. 605, page 339 U.S. 606. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HJLUKMA8IVU6ZV3.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605 (1950). cited in 1950, 339 U.S. 605, pp.339 U.S. 606. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HJLUKMA8IVU6ZV3.
|