|
|
United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Product Co., 238 U.S. 140 (1915)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Product Co., 238 U.S. 140 (1915)
United Surety Company v. American Fruit Product Company No. 203 Submitted May 12, 1915 Decided June 14, 1915 238 U.S. 140
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Syllabus
The right given to this Court by the sixth clause of § 250, Judicial Code, to reexamine the judgment of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia in cases in which the construction of any law of the United States is drawn in question by the defendant is confined to the construction of laws of general application throughout the United States, and does not include laws local in their application to the District of Columbia. American Security & Trust Co. v. District of Columbia, 224 U.S. 491.
Quaere whether, under the third clause of § 250, Judicial Code, this Court may not examine the judgment of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia where the constitutionality of a statute of the United States, whether general or local to the District, is involved.
Sections 454 and 455 of the District Code are not unconstitutional because they provide that a surety, by executing the undertaking to release property attached, is bound by the judgment against the principal, although it has no right to be heard, whether the value of the property released be fixed by appraisal or by the court. Beall v. New Mexico, 16 Wall. 535.
A constitutional question that has no real foundation cannot be put forward as a mere pretext to open other questions that otherwise could not come before this Court. Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71.
Writ of error to review 40 App.D.C. 239 dismissed.
The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this Court to review judgments of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia under § 250, Judicial Code, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Product Co., 238 U.S. 140 (1915) in 238 U.S. 140 238 U.S. 141. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HHH77DUANIGRU9B.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Product Co., 238 U.S. 140 (1915), in 238 U.S. 140, page 238 U.S. 141. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HHH77DUANIGRU9B.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Product Co., 238 U.S. 140 (1915). cited in 1915, 238 U.S. 140, pp.238 U.S. 141. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HHH77DUANIGRU9B.
|