|
Western Pac. R. Co. v. United States, 382 U.S. 237 (1965)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Western Pac. R. Co. v. United States, 382 U.S. 237 (1965)
Western Pacific Railroad Co. v. United States No. 12 Argued October 19, 1965 Decided December 7, 1965 382 U.S. 237
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Syllabus
Section 3(4) of the Interstate Commerce Act prohibits carriers from discriminating in their rates between "connecting lines." Appellant Western Pacific Railroad filed a complaint with the Interstate Commerce Commission alleging that certain carriers discriminated against it by refusing to enter into joint through rates via Portland, Oregon, with a multi-railroad route of which Western Pacific is the central portion, although they maintain such joint through rates with a competitor. Division 2 of the Commission refused to accord Western Pacific "connecting line" status on the ground that it did not connect physically with the allegedly discriminating carriers and did not participate in existing through routes with them through the point of discrimination. The Commission denied further hearing and a three-judge federal court dismissed the complaint on the basis that Western Pacific was not a "connecting line."
Held:
1. The term "connecting lines" does not require a direct physical connection, but refers to all lines making up a through route. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. United States, 284 U.S. 288, followed. Pp. 242-243.
2. To qualify as a "connecting line" in the absence of physical connection, a carrier need only show that it participates in an established through route, making connection at the point of common interchange, all of whose participants stand ready to cooperate in the arrangements needed to remove the alleged discrimination. P. 245.
230 F.Supp. 852, vacated and remanded.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Western Pac. R. Co. v. United States, 382 U.S. 237 (1965) in 382 U.S. 237 382 U.S. 238. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HF1Y7URKKIIHWPI.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Western Pac. R. Co. v. United States, 382 U.S. 237 (1965), in 382 U.S. 237, page 382 U.S. 238. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HF1Y7URKKIIHWPI.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Western Pac. R. Co. v. United States, 382 U.S. 237 (1965). cited in 1965, 382 U.S. 237, pp.382 U.S. 238. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HF1Y7URKKIIHWPI.
|