|
St. Louis Sw Ry. v. Dickerson, 470 U.S. 409 (1985)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
St. Louis Sw Ry. v. Dickerson, 470 U.S. 409 (1985)
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Dickerson No. 84-914 Decided March 4, 1985 470 U.S. 409
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF
APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT
Syllabus
Respondent railroad employee brought a personal injury action in a Missouri court against petitioner employer under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), alleging that a permanent disabling injury he received in a fall from a railroad car he was inspecting was the result of petitioner’s negligence. Respondent introduced evidence that his future wage losses would be about $1 million, and petitioner requested that the judge instruct the jury that, since respondent would have the use of any money awarded in a lump sum for loss of earnings in the future, the jury must determine the present value of the money awarded for such future loss. The judge refused to submit the instruction, because such an instruction was not provided for in the Missouri Approved Instructions promulgated by the Missouri Supreme Court for use in FELA cases. The jury found for respondent, awarding $1 million in damages, and the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed.
Held: As a general matter, FELA cases adjudicated in state courts are subject to state procedural rules, but the propriety of jury instructions concerning the measure of damages in such cases is an issue of "substance" to be determined by federal law. As a matter of federal law, a defendant in an FELA case is entitled to have the jury instructed that,
when future payments or other pecuniary benefits are to be anticipated, the verdict should be made up on the basis of their present value only.
Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. Kelly, 241 U.S. 485, 491. Thus, the instruction requested here should have been given.
Certiorari granted; 674 S.W.2d 165, reversed.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," St. Louis Sw Ry. v. Dickerson, 470 U.S. 409 (1985) in 470 U.S. 409 Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=H166U5NVNGH2NBE.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." St. Louis Sw Ry. v. Dickerson, 470 U.S. 409 (1985), in 470 U.S. 409, Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=H166U5NVNGH2NBE.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in St. Louis Sw Ry. v. Dickerson, 470 U.S. 409 (1985). cited in 1985, 470 U.S. 409. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=H166U5NVNGH2NBE.
|