|
|
Arizona v. California, 298 U.S. 558 (1936)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Arizona v. California, 298 U.S. 558 (1936)
Arizona v. California No. ___, original Argued April 28, 1936 Decided May 25, 1936 298 U.S. 558
PETITION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT
Syllabus
1. The United States is not subject to be sued without its consent, even by a State. P. 568.
2. Arizona tendered to this Court her original bill against California and the other States of the Colorado Rive Basin, praying for a judicial apportionment among them all of the unappropriated waters of that river and that she be decreed the unclouded right to the permanent use of her share. The United States, by the Boulder Canyon Project Act, and by acts of its officers thereunder, had undertaken, in the asserted exercise of its authority to control navigation, to impound, and control the disposition of, the surplus water in the stream not already appropriated; it was not denied that the natural, dependable flow was already over-appropriated, and it did not appear that, without the storage of the impounded water, any substantial amount of water would be available for appropriation. Held that permission to file the bill must be denied upon the ground that the United States would be an indispensable party. P. 570.
3. The fact that no decree rendered in its absence can bind the United States is not an inducement for this Court to decide the rights of the States before it by a decree which, because of the absence of the United States, could have no finality. P. 572.
4. Permission to file an original bill will not be granted if the bill, when filed, must be dismissed because of the absence of the United States as a party. P. 572.
Petition denied.
Arizona, on November 25, 1935, asked leave to file a bill against California and the five other States of the Colorado River Basin, praying in effect for a partition of the right to appropriate in the future the waters of the stream not as yet appropriated. The defendants were ruled to show cause, December 9, 1935, 296 U.S. 552. Returns to the rule were made on March 16, 1936. A motion by Fred T. Colter and others for leave to intervene was denied March 30, 1936, 297 U.S. 699. The case was argued and presented on the Arizona petition and the returns of the other States.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Arizona v. California, 298 U.S. 558 (1936) in 298 U.S. 558 298 U.S. 559. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GX6ZDJXFM5UQMAW.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Arizona v. California, 298 U.S. 558 (1936), in 298 U.S. 558, page 298 U.S. 559. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GX6ZDJXFM5UQMAW.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Arizona v. California, 298 U.S. 558 (1936). cited in 1936, 298 U.S. 558, pp.298 U.S. 559. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GX6ZDJXFM5UQMAW.
|