|
|
McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950)
McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education No. 34 Argued April 3-4, 1950 Decided June 5, 1950 339 U.S. 637
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Syllabus
Appellant, a Negro citizen of Oklahoma possessing a master’s degree, was admitted to the Graduate School of the state supported University of Oklahoma as a candidate for a doctorate in education and was permitted to use the same classroom, library and cafeteria as white students. Pursuant to a requirement of state law that the instruction of Negroes in institutions of higher education be "upon a segregated basis," however, he was assigned to a seat in the classroom in a row specified for Negro students, was assigned to a special table in the library, and, although permitted to eat in the cafeteria at the same time as other students, was assigned to a special table there.
Held: the conditions under which appellant is required to receive his education deprive him of his personal and present right to the equal protection of the laws, and the Fourteenth Amendment precludes such differences in treatment by the State based upon race. Pp. 638-642.
(a) The restrictions imposed upon appellant impair and inhibit his ability to study, to engage in discussions and exchange views with other students, and, in general, to learn his profession. Pp. 640-641.
(b) That appellant may still be set apart by his fellow students and may be in no better position when these restrictions are removed is irrelevant, for there is a constitutional difference between restrictions imposed by the State which prohibit the intellectual commingling of students and the refusal of students to commingle where the State presents no such bar. P. 641.
(c) Having been admitted to a state supported graduate school, appellant must receive the same treatment at the hands of the State as students of other races. P. 642.
87 F.Supp. 528 reversed.
The proceedings below are stated in the opinion. The judgment below is reversed, p. 642.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950) in 339 U.S. 637 339 U.S. 638. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GI5BQSD844XKCRV.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950), in 339 U.S. 637, page 339 U.S. 638. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GI5BQSD844XKCRV.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950). cited in 1950, 339 U.S. 637, pp.339 U.S. 638. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GI5BQSD844XKCRV.
|