|
In Re Sawyer, 360 U.S. 622 (1959)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
In Re Sawyer, 360 U.S. 622 (1959)
In re Sawyer No. 326 Argued May 19-20, 1959 Decided June 29, 1959 360 U.S. 622
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
While actively participating as one of the defense counsel in a protracted and highly publicized trial in a Federal District Court in Hawaii of several defendants for conspiracy under the Smith Act, petitioner appeared with one of the defendants at a public meeting and made a speech which led to charges that she had impugned the impartiality and fairness of the presiding judge in conducting the trial and had thus reflected upon his integrity in dispensing justice in the case. These charges were preferred by the Bar Association of Hawaii before the Territorial Supreme Court; that Court referred the charges to the Ethics Committee of the Bar Association, which held a hearing, and found the charges sustained. The Territorial Supreme Court, upon review of the record, also sustained the charges, and ordered that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for one year. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed.
Held: the record does not support the charge and the findings growing out of petitioner’s speech, and the judgment is reversed. Pp. 623-640, 646-647.
260 F.2d 189 reversed.
For judgment of the Court and opinion of MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, joined by THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK, and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, see pp. 623-640.
For appendix to the opinion of MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, see p. 640.
For concurring opinion of MR. JUSTICE BLACK, see p. 646.
For opinion of MR. JUSTICE STEWART, concurring in the result, see p. 646.
For dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, joined by MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER, see p. 647.
For dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE CLARK, see p. 669.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," In Re Sawyer, 360 U.S. 622 (1959) in 360 U.S. 622 360 U.S. 623. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GHTR9U4NMCB3M2L.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." In Re Sawyer, 360 U.S. 622 (1959), in 360 U.S. 622, page 360 U.S. 623. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GHTR9U4NMCB3M2L.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in In Re Sawyer, 360 U.S. 622 (1959). cited in 1959, 360 U.S. 622, pp.360 U.S. 623. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GHTR9U4NMCB3M2L.
|