|
Male v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 240 U.S. 97 (1916)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Male v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 240 U.S. 97 (1916)
Male v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company No. 220 Argued January 24, 1916 Decided February 21, 1916 240 U.S. 97
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Syllabus
Whether a subsequent decision between the same parties upon the same cause of action makes the questions involved in the earlier decision moot involves the defense of the thing adjudged going to the merits, and cannot be considered on a direct appeal under § 238, Jud.Code, on which this Court can only consider the question of the jurisdiction of the court below.
So far as controversies in a case brought in the federal court depend alone upon the right to sue because of the district in which the parties reside, they are personal, and susceptible of being waived, and are not intrinsically and necessarily federal; but if they involve federal privileges not waived, they are federal questions susceptible of being brought to this Court by direct appeal under § 238, Jud.Code.
The asserted right to a judgment on bonds of a corporation created by act of Congress involves an inherently federal question.
A corporation is entitled to be sued in the district of its residence, and, without the consent of such corporation, the District Court of the United States for another district has no jurisdiction of an action involving an inherently federal question.
The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this Court under § 238, Jud.Code, and of the district court under § 51, Jud.Code, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Male v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 240 U.S. 97 (1916) in 240 U.S. 97 240 U.S. 98. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GELVMW1TQYT72Y8.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Male v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 240 U.S. 97 (1916), in 240 U.S. 97, page 240 U.S. 98. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GELVMW1TQYT72Y8.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Male v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 240 U.S. 97 (1916). cited in 1916, 240 U.S. 97, pp.240 U.S. 98. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GELVMW1TQYT72Y8.
|