Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury, 323 U.S. 459 (1945)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury, 323 U.S. 459 (1945)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 323 U.S. 454, click here.
Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury of Indiana No. 75 Argued December 7, 1944 Decided January 8, 1945 323 U.S. 459
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. A suit against the Department of Treasury of the Indiana and individuals constituting the "Board of the Department of Treasury," brought pursuant to § 64-2614 of Burns’ Indiana Statutes Annotated (1943 Replacement) for a refund of taxes alleged to have been illegally collected, held a suit against the State, in respect of which the State had not consented to the jurisdiction of the federal district court. P. 463.
2. Where a suit is, in essence, one for the recovery of money from the State, the State is the real party in interest, and is entitled to invoke its sovereign immunity from suit even though individual officials are nominal defendants. P. 464.
3. The Eleventh Amendment denies to the federal courts authority to entertain a suit brought by private parties against a State without the State’s consent. P. 464.
4. Interpretation of § 64-2614 as authorizing suits for refunds of taxes only in state court accords with the legislative policy of the State. P. 466.
5. The contention that the suit is against the State and in contravention of the Eleventh Amendment is considered by this Court though urged here for the first time in this proceeding. P. 467.
6. Neither the attorney general nor any other administrative or executive officer of the State was authorized by state law to waive the State’s immunity in this proceeding. P. 468.
141 F.2d 24, vacated.
Certiorari 322 U.S. 721, to review the affirmance of a judgment denying recovery in a suit for a refund of state taxes alleged to have been illegally collected.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury, 323 U.S. 459 (1945) in 323 U.S. 459 323 U.S. 460. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=G935NT9DYUV2Y5L.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury, 323 U.S. 459 (1945), in 323 U.S. 459, page 323 U.S. 460. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=G935NT9DYUV2Y5L.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury, 323 U.S. 459 (1945). cited in 1945, 323 U.S. 459, pp.323 U.S. 460. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=G935NT9DYUV2Y5L.
|