Duignan v. United States, 274 U.S. 195 (1927)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Duignan v. United States, 274 U.S. 195 (1927)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 274 U.S. 188, click here.
Duignan v. United States No. 101 Argued February 21, 1927 Decided April 25, 1927 274 U.S. 195
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. Case held properly reviewable by appeal under Jud.Code § 241, before amendment, and certiorari denied. P. 197.
2. In a suit by the United States against a lessor and a lessee to abate a liquor nuisance under § 22 of Title II of the Prohibition Act, issues raised by a cross-bill of the lessor asserting his federal right under § 23 to a forfeiture of the lease as against the lessee are within the jurisdiction of the district court regardless of the citizenship of the parties. P. 197.
3. A suit by the United States to abate a liquor nuisance under § 22 of Title II of the Prohibition Act is a suit in equity, and triable without a jury. P. 197.
4. The constitutional right to a jury trial may be waived by proceeding to trial without demanding a jury, and is not saved by an application to the discretionary power of the court, sitting in equity, to frame issues for a jury. P. 198.
5. To support a demand for a jury trial of matter raised by a cross-bill, the demandant must first put them in issue by answering the cross-bill. P. 199.
6. Objections to the equity jurisdiction to adjudge a forfeiture of a lease under § 23 of Title II of the Prohibition Act, and to the assertion of this right through a cross-bill filed by the lessor against the lessee in a suit brought against them both by the United States under § 22, are waived if not seasonably taken. P. 199.
4 F.2d 983 affirmed.
Appeal from a decree of the circuit court of appeals which affirmed a decree of the district court abating a nuisance and adjudging forfeiture of a lease under §§ 22 and 23 of the Prohibition Act.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Duignan v. United States, 274 U.S. 195 (1927) in 274 U.S. 195 274 U.S. 196. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=G8S5UZUQP1ZTA5W.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Duignan v. United States, 274 U.S. 195 (1927), in 274 U.S. 195, page 274 U.S. 196. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=G8S5UZUQP1ZTA5W.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Duignan v. United States, 274 U.S. 195 (1927). cited in 1927, 274 U.S. 195, pp.274 U.S. 196. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=G8S5UZUQP1ZTA5W.
|