Wright v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 236 U.S. 674 (1915)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Wright v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 236 U.S. 674 (1915)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 236 U.S. 668, click here.
Wright v. Central of Georgia Railway Company No. 161 Argued January 28, 29, 1915 Decided March 22, 1915 236 U.S. 674
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Syllabus
This Court will not presume that a state legislature in granting a charter containing exemptions would either practice deceit or make a futile grant.
A lessee of railroads which were built under special charters containing irrepealable contracts by which the property was not subject to be taxed higher than a specified percent on the annual income derived therefrom is not subject to an ad valorem tax as the owner of such property.
The statutes of Georgia in regard to the taxation of railroads involved in this action are construed as making the fee exempt from other taxation than that provided for in favor of the lessee as well as of the lessor.
While technical distinctions should be avoided a far as may be in matters of taxation in the interest of substantial justice, they should not be disregarded in order to enable a state to escape from a binding bargain, and so held in regard to distinctions between lessors and lessees where the protection of the latter is necessary in order to make good the promise of the state made to the former.
The courts cannot take the place of the taxing power, nor can taxes based on ownership of the property be enforced against a lessee of the property under the statutes of Georgia and the leases involved in this case.
206 F. 107 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Wright v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 236 U.S. 674 (1915) in 236 U.S. 674 236 U.S. 675–236 U.S. 676. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=G1I1T2SIF6LETDF.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Wright v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 236 U.S. 674 (1915), in 236 U.S. 674, pp. 236 U.S. 675–236 U.S. 676. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=G1I1T2SIF6LETDF.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Wright v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 236 U.S. 674 (1915). cited in 1915, 236 U.S. 674, pp.236 U.S. 675–236 U.S. 676. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=G1I1T2SIF6LETDF.
|