|
Texas v. Eastern Texas R. Co., 258 U.S. 204 (1922)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Texas v. Eastern Texas R. Co., 258 U.S. 204 (1922)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 258 U.S. 198, click here.
Texas v. Eastern Texas Railroad Company Nos. 298 and 563 Argued November 15, 16, 1921 Decided March 13, 1922 258 U.S. 204
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Syllabus
1. Where a statute is susceptible of two constructions, one raising grave and doubtful constitutional questions and the other not, it is the duty of the court to adopt the latter. P. 217.
2. Paragraphs 120 of § 1 of the Act to Regulate Commerce, added by § 402 of the Transportation Act of 1920, which regulate the construction and acquisition of new lines of railroad and the extension and abandonment of old lines, are not to be construed as clothing the Interstate Commerce Commission with authority over the discontinuance of the purely intrastate business of a railroad whose situation and ownership are such that interstate and foreign commerce will not be affected by that business. P. 218.
Reversed.
The first of these cases is an appeal from a decree of the District Court for the Western District of Texas dismissing a suit removed from a court of that state in which the Texas sought to enjoin the above-named railroad company and some of its officers from ceasing to operate its road in intrastate commerce. The other is an appeal from a decree of the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas dismissing the bill in a suit brought by the state and its Attorney General, in that court, against the United States, the members of the Interstate Commerce Commission, the United States Attorney General, and the above-named and two other railroad companies to annul an order and certificate of the Interstate Commerce Commission purporting to permit the abandonment of the same railroad line upon certain conditions.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Texas v. Eastern Texas R. Co., 258 U.S. 204 (1922) in 258 U.S. 204 258 U.S. 205–258 U.S. 212. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FVM2UGNT4F5SVSW.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Texas v. Eastern Texas R. Co., 258 U.S. 204 (1922), in 258 U.S. 204, pp. 258 U.S. 205–258 U.S. 212. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FVM2UGNT4F5SVSW.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Texas v. Eastern Texas R. Co., 258 U.S. 204 (1922). cited in 1922, 258 U.S. 204, pp.258 U.S. 205–258 U.S. 212. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FVM2UGNT4F5SVSW.
|