|
|
Bread Political Action Comm’n v. Fec, 455 U.S. 577 (1982)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Bread Political Action Comm’n v. Fec, 455 U.S. 577 (1982)
Bread Political Action Committee v. Federal Election Commission No. 80-1481 Argued January 19, 1982 Decided March 8, 1982 455 U.S. 577
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Section 310(a) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 lists three categories of plaintiffs who may challenge the constitutionality of any provision of the Act in a federal district court action in which the district court must certify all questions of constitutionality to the court of appeals sitting en banc: (1) the Federal Election Commission, (2) "the national committee of any political party," and (3) "any individual eligible to vote in any election for the office of President." Appellants, two trade associations and three political action committees (PAC’s), filed an action in Federal District Court, challenging the validity of the provisions of the Act limiting the extent to which such associations and their PAC’s may solicit funds for political purposes, and sought expedited consideration of the action under § 310(a). The District Court denied such consideration on the ground that appellants were not within any of the three categories listed as eligible to invoke § 310(a)’s expedited procedures. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded, holding that § 310(a) is available for use by plaintiffs whether they belong to an enumerated category or not, and, on subsequent certification from the District Court, upheld the challenged solicitation provisions.
Held: Only parties belonging to one of the three categories listed in § 310(a) may invoke its expedited procedures, and since appellants are not within any of those categories, they may not invoke such procedures. The text of § 310(a) states plainly enough which plaintiffs may invoke its special procedures. This plain language controls the construction of § 310(a), absent "clear evidence" of a "clearly expressed" contrary congressional intent, and appellants have not met the burden of showing such "clear evidence" of a contrary intent. The fact that Congress wanted a broad class of questions to be speedily resolved does not imply that it intended the courts to augment the enumeration of qualified plaintiffs. Nor is there any merit to appellants’ contention that Congress specified the three enumerated classes of plaintiffs simply to remove any doubts about their standing, but not to exclude others by implication. Pp. 580-585.
635 F.2d 621, reversed and remanded.
O’CONNOR, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Bread Political Action Comm’n v. Fec, 455 U.S. 577 (1982) in 455 U.S. 577 455 U.S. 578. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FTRVEJDEAC2CV5U.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Bread Political Action Comm’n v. Fec, 455 U.S. 577 (1982), in 455 U.S. 577, page 455 U.S. 578. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FTRVEJDEAC2CV5U.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Bread Political Action Comm’n v. Fec, 455 U.S. 577 (1982). cited in 1982, 455 U.S. 577, pp.455 U.S. 578. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FTRVEJDEAC2CV5U.
|