|
Jenkins v. National Surety Co., 277 U.S. 258 (1928)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Jenkins v. National Surety Co., 277 U.S. 258 (1928)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 277 U.S. 245, click here.
Jenkins v. National Surety Co. No. 424 Argued April 11, 12, 1928 Decided May 14, 1928 277 U.S. 258
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
A surety company went on the bond furnished by a bank to secure repayment on demand of the deposits of a county treasurer up to a specified amount, and, as part consideration for executing the bond, took the bank’s agreement to indemnify it for any liability it might thereby sustain or incur. The bank became insolvent while holding deposits of the treasurer exceeding the amount of the bond, and the surety, having paid that amount, sought to participate pro rata with him and his surety in the distribution of surplus assets of the bank, basing its claim on the indemnity agreement.
Held:
1. That a former judgment denying the surety the right to be subrogated to the creditor’s claim and remedies against the debtor until the creditor had been paid in full did not bar the surety’s claim under the indemnity agreement. P. 265.
2. That the indemnity claim should not be allowed. A surety for part of an indebtedness does not, through the expedient of taking a separate indemnity agreement from the debtor, equip himself to compete with the secured creditor in the distribution of the debtor’s assets when the debtor becomes insolvent and the surety’s obligation has been paid. P. 265.
18 F.2d 707 reversed.
Certiorari, 275 U.S. 515, to a decree of the circuit court of appeals, which allowed the respondent surety company’s claim to share, by way of indemnity, in assets of an insolvent national bank. The claim had been denied in the district court.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Jenkins v. National Surety Co., 277 U.S. 258 (1928) in 277 U.S. 258 277 U.S. 259–277 U.S. 263. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FRSX69SS6WKF4YM.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Jenkins v. National Surety Co., 277 U.S. 258 (1928), in 277 U.S. 258, pp. 277 U.S. 259–277 U.S. 263. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FRSX69SS6WKF4YM.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Jenkins v. National Surety Co., 277 U.S. 258 (1928). cited in 1928, 277 U.S. 258, pp.277 U.S. 259–277 U.S. 263. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FRSX69SS6WKF4YM.
|