|
St. Louis, K. & S.E. R. Co. v. United States, 267 U.S. 346 (1925)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
St. Louis, K. & S.E. R. Co. v. United States, 267 U.S. 346 (1925)
St. Louis, Kennett & Southeastern Railroad Co. v. United States No. 229 Argued January 23, 1925 Decided March 2, 1925 267 U.S. 346
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS
Syllabus
1. A railroad company in a contract with the Director General of Railroads expressly accepted the covenants and obligations of the latter and the rights arising thereunder
in full adjustment, settlement, satisfaction, and discharge of any and all claims and rights at law or in equity, which it now has or hereafter can have against the United States, the President, the Director General or any agent or agency thereof by virtue of anything done or omitted, pursuant to the acts of Congress herein referred to,
viz., the Federal Control Act, the Act of Aug. 29, 1916, c. 418, 39 Stat. 645, and the Joint Resolutions of April 6 and December 7, 1917, 40 Stat. 1, 429. Held, that a claim of the railroad under § 3 of the Federal Control Act for a deficit in operating income, etc., previously incurred under federal control, was settled and released by the contract, and that allegations in the company’s petition denying this effect and intention were mere conclusions of law, not admitted by demurrer. P. 348.
2. Ordinarily, the defense of release, or accord and satisfaction, must be pleaded in bar, but where the fact appears either in the body of the petition or from an exhibit annexed, the defense may be availed of on demurrer. P. 350.
3. The agreement was within the authority of the Director General. Id.
58 Ct.Clms. 339 affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing the petition on demurrer.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," St. Louis, K. & S.E. R. Co. v. United States, 267 U.S. 346 (1925) in 267 U.S. 346 267 U.S. 347. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FR63LWJF2T5TBKE.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." St. Louis, K. & S.E. R. Co. v. United States, 267 U.S. 346 (1925), in 267 U.S. 346, page 267 U.S. 347. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FR63LWJF2T5TBKE.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in St. Louis, K. & S.E. R. Co. v. United States, 267 U.S. 346 (1925). cited in 1925, 267 U.S. 346, pp.267 U.S. 347. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=FR63LWJF2T5TBKE.
|